ba_ble - inarticulations on human - animal relations
Small Bird Trap |
Mouth Stuffed |
What
exactly is our relationship with animals? We use them for work
and research, we
eat them and we keep them as pets. They are what connects us to
the natural
world. With our more developed brains we consider ourselves
superior, as if we
have a higher purpose than mere
existence.
Unlike animals we use complex language, we build cathedrals, we
journey to the moon, we go shopping and watch Dancing With The
Stars. Our
intellects allow us to be objective about our situation, but
they put us at one
remove. We are natural beings but we are separate.
Connie Morey wonders about this separation. She is an artist, writer and teacher currently doing doctoral research at University of Victoria. Her research focuses on ‘the ecological foundations of imagination and is inspired by the writings of West Coast philosopher and poet Jan Zwicky’. Ba_ble, the show’s title is deliberately imprecise. Articulation is part of the quest.
Connie Morey wonders about this separation. She is an artist, writer and teacher currently doing doctoral research at University of Victoria. Her research focuses on ‘the ecological foundations of imagination and is inspired by the writings of West Coast philosopher and poet Jan Zwicky’. Ba_ble, the show’s title is deliberately imprecise. Articulation is part of the quest.
She
approaches the problem from various directions using different
media. There is
a chest of drawers containing vaguely defined biomorphic
shapes. Bird traps
that both ensnare and nurture. A painting of a boy and his dog
reduced to
sub-atomic particles lost in the cosmos. Bird imprints in clay
that may be
flying or fossilized and a series of serene heads with their
mouths stuffed
full of fur. It all has to do with language and human/animal relations
but the interpretations
are as varied as the viewers. Morey clearly wants us to see
the complexity
of the problem, We
have to supply our
own absolutes.
This
combination of paintings,
sculptural
forms and conceptual pieces all fit together nicely and
suggest an extended
consideration from more
than just one
angle. Morey is clearly open to varied interpretations. Morey
also wonders if
the same rules and criteria apply to different human cultures.
It’s a valid
question. And a vast subject with broad
implications. Morey is not the first to tackle it.
It is
always dangerous to generalize about cultural differences. We
live in a global
system now, cultural differences have become blurred. Can we
say that we in the
first world are kinder to animals? Yes, we love our pets, but
thousands of
animals are slaughtered daily behind abattoir walls where we
can’t see the
reality. It’s as if the meat just magically appears in the
supermarket display
cases. Perhaps third world markets where it’s possible to
watch cattle, sheep
and pigs having their throats slit are more honest and natural? Do we tend to
romanticize indigenous
cultures? Who are we to say some people shouldn’t eat monkeys,
dogs and guinea
pigs?
Nurture
or nature? Structure or agency? Alien intervention or natural
selection?
Without getting too Darwinian about it we have evolved into
highly
sophisticated creatures. But our bodies still demand
sustenance. Vegans would
probably disagree but the truth is we kill to live even if
we’re only squishing
slugs and aphids to protect our vegetables. There is an
argument that nature
itself is cruel and uncaring. As if that somehow justifies
ritual acts of
cruelty like bullfighting or using puppies for shark-bait. But
what about
people who enjoy hunting and fishing? Are they cruel? How much
responsibility
do we, as the dominant species, have to care for other
creatures? And not just the
cute cuddly ones.
In her
show at Xchanges Morey explores these questions and tries to resolve them.
The work is
stimulating and thought-provoking. There is nothing
intentionally shocking. There
is no overt existential crisis; no tormented forms writhing
like raw meat. She
makes her point subtly. (The only piece that might be
considered potentially
disturbing is ‘Mouth Stuffed Full’. But even that has nothing
accusatory about
it.) We feel absolved. But the mystery remains. Maybe she has
only touched the
surface but she has succeeded in reducing it to aesthetically
pleasing
equations for us to ponder.
Philip Willey
Philip Willey
i don't think people should eat my dog, that's for sure. also i wish you weren't squishing slugs. they're beautiful and they belong. i usually just move them far away from my garden...into the neighbours yard or something. :)
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAh so that's where all the deroceras reticulatum are coming from. Would you like to come and take them back? We would like a few peas this year.
ReplyDeleteactually i don't even try to grow veggies where i am because the slug population is rampant. we grew cabbages in pots one year...we had to rig up a platform in a tree just to keep the slugs away! i've even had slugs come into the house and eat my house plants...true story. so i guess i have just surrendered to the power of the slug and have learned to love them and to love the lacy foliage on my hostas too.
ReplyDeleteLove is not a word I would use when it comes to slugs. Except for Banana slugs of course which are adorable and prefer forest floors anyway. One strives for peaceful co-existence with the peskier varieties whilst discouraging them with slug bait.
ReplyDelete